Disputes create overhang for Woodside

Wed 01 Dec 21, 3:00am (AEST)

Stocks in article


Share article

Key Points

  • More institutional investors are exiting their oil & gas holdings.
  • Woodside is accused of dramatically underestimating the amount of CO2 the combined Scarborough and Pluto-2 project will emit.
  • Watch out for 8 December investor briefing.

Given the alacrity with which news surrounding Woodside Petroleum (ASX: WPL) is hitting the market right now, investors can be forgiven for struggling to keep up with the dynamics confronting the oil and gas producer on multiple fronts.

Earlier this week two of Australia’s top super funds, AustralianSuper and UniSuper, decided they wanted to exorcise Woodside and other undiversified fossil fuel producers from their portfolios.

These funds are responding to mounting pressure on all retirement funds to protect long-term savings from the alleged ravages of catastrophic climate change.

The decision by retirement fund and others to divest fossil fuel producers coincides with Woodside’s transformational $41bn merger deal with BHP Petroleum (ASX: BHP).


Meantime, the latest forest fire confronting Woodside is its defence of the latest legal challenge to its $16.5bn Scarborough gas project which has surfaced only days after this equally transformational investment got the green light to proceed. 

Given that the Scarborough project is arguably the country’s biggest fossil fuel investment for almost a decade, it’s hardly surprising that it has met with considerable opposition.

While Woodside believes Scarborough would be one of the lowest carbon emissions intensity LNG projects worldwide to be in production in 2030, the Conservation Council of Western Australia (CCWA) isn’t so convinced.

C02 emissions disputed

An action lodged in the Supreme Court of Western Australia by CCWA argues that the Woodside has dramatically underestimated – by as much a half – amount of CO2 the combined Scarborough and Pluto-2 project will emit over its lifetime.

CCWA asserts that the works approval issued by the head of WA’s Department of Water and Environmental Regulation fails to properly consider the environmental harm generated by greenhouse gas emissions, and is hence unlawful.

CCWA’s recent judicial review challenge - to the onshore part of the Scarborough project - follows the conservation group’s petition last month for Federal Environment Minister Sussan Ley to require Woodside to refer the Scarborough project for assessment under federal environmental legislation.

Discount to peers lingers

Like a lot of its Australian contemporaries, Woodside has struggled to participate in the share price appreciation enjoyed by its global peers. This is one of reasons why the merger with BHP Petroleum had considerable appeal. 

By becoming a top-ten player in this space globally, Woodside expects to be on the radar of the large institutional investors that have up until now overlooked the company as a regional player at best.

In time, Woodside expects heightened global attention to find its way to the share price.

Even Morningstar, which tends to be more conservative in assessments, regards Woodside as significantly undervalued relative to a fair value of $29.95. 

Investors should watch out for the December 8 investor briefing which is expected to shed more light on capital allocation. 

Written By

Mark Story


Mark is an award-winning investigative financial journalist and editor who started his career working for Marathon Oil in London. He has a degree in politics/economics, a diploma in journalism and has completed the Institute of Directors course. Mark has worked on 70-plus newspapers and financial publications across Australia, NZ, the US, and Asia including: The Australian Financial Review, Money Magazine, Australian Property Investor and Finance Asia. Mark is passionate about improving the financial literacy of all Australians through the highest quality content.

Get the latest news and media direct to your inbox

Sign up FREE